Topic summary
⁠74%6 analyzed articles/videos2,560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minimum Wage results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 2,696 hits. Analysis detected 22,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,688 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,112 of 15,447 topics). This Minimum Wage is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos