Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charley Duffin results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 886 hits . Analysis detected 3,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,827 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (483 of 6,455 authors). This Charley Duffin is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Charley Duffin
Author details
Total words: 1,827
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.5% percentile 8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 48.5% 48.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 13.5% 13.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.3% 12.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 48.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Bandwagon: Author 13.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.3%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Personal Incredulity: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst