Topic summary
55% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle East Tensions results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 4,272 hits . Analysis detected 36,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,098 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,896 of 16,562 topics). This Middle East Tensions is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Middle East Tensions
Topic details
Total words: 47,098
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles47.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst