Topic summary
34% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Goods results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,849 hits . Analysis detected 17,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,484 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,391 of 15,447 topics). This Luxury Goods is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Luxury Goods
Topic details
Total words: 19,484
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst