Author summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manal Albarakati results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 158 hits . Analysis detected 1,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 786 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (695 of 6,346 authors). This Manal Albarakati is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. Manal Albarakati
Author details
Total words: 786
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.1% percentile 6.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles786 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 20.1% 20.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.7% 12.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.1% 15.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.6% 7.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 20.1%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst