Topic summary
32% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,489 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Cases results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 2,226 hits . Analysis detected 14,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,074 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (13,829 of 15,328 topics). This Legal Cases is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Legal Cases
Topic details
Total words: 19,074
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst