Author summary
83%1 analyzed article/video459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chase DiBenedetto results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 1,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,377 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,543 of 6,628 authors). This Chase DiBenedetto is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Chase DiBenedetto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
77%Chase DiBenedetto (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,377
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510076.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 17.7%17.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos