Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Ortutay results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 3,000 hits . Analysis detected 22,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,060 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,944 of 6,382 authors). This Barbara Ortutay is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Barbara Ortutay
Author details
Total words: 18,060
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst