Author summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos6,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Ortutay results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 3,000 hits. Analysis detected 22,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,060 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,944 of 6,382 authors). This Barbara Ortutay is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Barbara Ortutay
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
54%Barbara Ortutay (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,060
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.5%11.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate