Topic summary
⁠34%5 analyzed articles/videos2,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lebron James results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 5,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,691 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (9,878 of 15,781 topics). This Lebron James is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Lebron James
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos