Topic summary
58% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keir Starmer results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 2,135 hits . Analysis detected 25,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,630 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,945 of 16,559 topics). This Keir Starmer is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Keir Starmer
Topic details
Total words: 23,630
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst