Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Charlotte Cripps results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 1,517 hits. Analysis detected 7,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Charlotte Cripps is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Charlotte Cripps
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Charlotte Cripps (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,840
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 39.5%39.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 13.1%13.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.7%13.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.4%6.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 13.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos