Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kamala Harris results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 2,085 hits . Analysis detected 16,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,424 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,184 of 15,327 topics). This Kamala Harris is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Kamala Harris
Topic details
Total words: 14,424
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst