White House mocked for bizarre Harambe tribute post 10 years after gorilla’s death at Cincinnati Zoo 45%

By Owen Scott0%

5/28/2026, 10:14:19 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 627 faulty-reasoning hits from 413 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.8% and a BS Rank of 45% (11,342 of 20,371 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the article peer group.

The White House has been mocked online after it posted a lengthy tribute to Harambe, a gorilla fatally shot at the Cincinnati Zoo 10 years ago during an attempt to save a three-year-old boy who fell into the gorilla habitat. 
Harambe became a viral internet meme after he was killed by a zoo worker on May 28, 2016. 
The boy apparently climbed over the outer barrier before falling some 15ft into a shallow moat. 
A special response team shot and killed the 17-year-old western lowland gorilla to protect the boy. 
Harambe did not return inside after zoo officials signalled for him to do so and, instead, went to investigate the child, who had fallen into a moat. 
The gorilla dragged the child from the moat onto dry land, but was eventually shot and killed. 
The zoo described the action as necessary “in order to save the life of a child” 
In a post on X, the White House said: “Rest easy to a true patriot.” 
The post, which was shared late on Wednesday night, added: “Tomorrow marks 10 years since we lost him.” 
“He became a symbol of loyalty, strength, chaos, unity, and the strange beauty of the internet bringing millions of people together for one cause: never forgetting Harambe,” the post read. 
“Everyone remembers where they were when they heard the news.” 
Harambe quickly became an internet meme after his death, amid an internet backlash to his killing. 
Social media websites were flooded with tributes to him, with a “Justice for Harambe” petition eventually being launched. 
Former Vice President Kamala Harris’s Gen-Z-focused X account, Headquarters, took a swipe at the White House over the post. 
The account shared an image of a man in an orange t-shirt branded with a Reddit logo, which it captioned, “How the admin felt posting this.” 
Reddit, an online social media platform, is a popular site for sharing internet memes. 
Another account posted, “Reddit occupied government.” 
“Glad to see the White House is laser-focused on the key issues of the day,” one user quipped. 
At the time of the shooting, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump said that zoo employees “probably had no choice.” 
The gorilla was named as “2016’s meme of the year” by Vox. 
In July 2016, Public Policy Polling reported that more respondents support for the late gorilla for president was greater than support for the Green Party’s Jill Stein. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.6%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%Owen Scott: 2.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic17.7%This article: 3.4%Owen Scott: 0.6%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic3.4%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.4%The Independent: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Owen Scott: 5.5%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect8.2%This article: 7.3%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion7.3%This article: 4.4%Owen Scott: 0.7%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.5%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 29.5%Owen Scott: 8.4%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias29.5%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.4%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Owen Scott: 1.1%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error3.9%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Owen Scott: 2.2%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.8%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.3%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Owen Scott: 0.7%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.6%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Owen Scott: 2.9%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem6.1%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Owen Scott: 4.4%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 5.8%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 1.5%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.9%Owen Scott: 2.3%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization10.9%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.9%Owen Scott: 5.9%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion17.9%This article: 6.8%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question6.8%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 3.2%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.8%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.9%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading3.9%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Owen Scott: 2.5%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote3.9%This article: 3.6%Owen Scott: 2.8%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.6%This article: 3.9%Owen Scott: 3.1%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice3.9%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.6%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.9%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

413 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers46%attributed speech222writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCincinnati Zoo • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWhite House • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWhite House • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKamala Harris • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHeadquarters • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageVox • 12 words • 0.0% coveragePublic Policy Polling • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words9.4% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.