Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gorilla results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 252 hits . Analysis detected 1,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (6,659 of 15,689 topics). This Gorilla is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Gorilla
Topic details
Total words: 1,652
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst