Cleaning Up Kamala 16%

By Sean Moody0%

7/6/2026, 1:22:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 192 faulty-reasoning hits from 91 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of 16% (17,379 of 20,474 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the article peer group.

Cleaning Up Kamala 
This humorous documentary exposes the biased media’s attempt to purge Kamala Harris of her unfortunate past, just in time for the 2024 presidential election. 
Written by: Sean Moody. 
Produced by: Sean Moody. 
Associate Producer: Claire Carson. 
Narrated by: Greg Niecestro. 
Interviewees. 
Amber Duke, Emily Jashinsky, Kim Alfano, Tucker Carlson. 
Executive Producers: Geoffrey Ingersoll, Neil Patel. 
Director of Photography: Rachel Page. 
Edited by: Mary Mccants, Rachel Page, Sean Moody. 
Graphics by: Claire Carson, Mary Mccants. 
Sound Design: Mary Mccants. 
Animation: Rachel Page, Sean Moody. 
53 minutes 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.4%Sean Moody: 13.2%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Confirmation Bias26.4%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.4%Sean Moody: 29.7%The Daily Caller: 10.4%Framing Effect26.4%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 6.6%The Daily Caller: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.4%Sean Moody: 28.0%The Daily Caller: 8.2%Negativity Bias26.4%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 26.4%Sean Moody: 6.6%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Ad Hominem26.4%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 4.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 6.6%The Daily Caller: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 13.2%The Daily Caller: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 26.4%Sean Moody: 13.2%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Begging the Question26.4%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 26.4%Sean Moody: 28.0%The Daily Caller: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice26.4%This article: 26.4%Sean Moody: 6.6%The Daily Caller: 3.6%Indoctrination26.4%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 26.4%Sean Moody: 23.6%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias26.4%This article: 0.0%Sean Moody: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

91 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.