Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jd Vance (politician) results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 557 hits. Analysis detected 2,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,580 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,386 of 15,344 topics). This Jd Vance (politician) is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Jd Vance (politician)

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.5% percentile
6.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.6%24.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 35.3%35.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 35.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos