Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isis results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 2,746 hits . Analysis detected 20,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,035 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,325 of 15,142 topics). This Isis is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Isis
Topic details
Total words: 17,035
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst