Author summary
ā 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Grossman results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 57.4% saturation with 2,435 hits . Analysis detected 14,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,243 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of ā 96% (279 of 6,170 authors). This Nicholas Grossman is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Nicholas Grossman
Author details
Total words: 4,243
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.5% percentile 11.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 57.4% 57.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 24.6% 24.6% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Author 21.7% 21.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 24.8% 24.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 24.8% 24.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 19.5% 19.5% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 31.4% 31.4% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.2% 13.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Author 57.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 31.4%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 26.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 24.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 24.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 24.6%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 21.7%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 19.5%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Author 16.5%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 13.2%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Straw Man: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst