Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jericho Dancel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 3,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 810 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of 99% (119 of 6,169 authors). This Jericho Dancel is worse (more manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group.
Jericho Dancel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
99%Jericho Dancel (selected)17%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 810
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510098.1% percentile
16.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles810 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 53.8%53.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 52.8%52.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 38.8%38.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 31.7%31.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 29.1%29.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 24.1%24.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 17.5%17.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 36.4%36.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 10.0%10.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Author 53.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 52.8%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 38.8%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Author 36.4%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 31.7%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 29.1%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 24.1%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Author 17.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 14.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Author 10.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos