Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jericho Dancel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 3,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 810 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of 99% (119 of 6,169 authors). This Jericho Dancel is worse (more manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Jericho Dancel
Author details
Total words: 810
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.1% percentile 16.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles810 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 53.8% 53.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 52.8% 52.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 38.8% 38.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 31.7% 31.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 29.1% 29.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 24.1% 24.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 17.5% 17.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 36.4% 36.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 10.0% 10.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% In-Group Bias: Author 53.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 52.8%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 38.8%, sitewide 4.6% Framing Effect: Author 36.4%, sitewide 26.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 31.7%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 29.1%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 24.1%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Author 17.5%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 14.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Author 10.0%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst