Topic summary
35% 15 analyzed articles/videos 8,976 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Soccer results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 5,081 hits . Analysis detected 31,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,027 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (15,162 of 16,562 topics). This International Soccer is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. International Soccer
Topic details
Total words: 42,027
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score15 analyzed articles42K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 49% 7/14/2026, 1:49:45 AM