Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Instagram results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,728 hits . Analysis detected 14,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,734 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,122 of 16,559 topics). This Instagram is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. Instagram
Topic details
Total words: 16,734
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst