Farrah Abraham's horrifying hair extensions exposed by disgruntled stylist as fans compare her mangled mane to a rat's nest ⁠66%

By J. Peterson⁠0%

4/14/2026, 9:15:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.4% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 597 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (7,620 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the article peer group.

Former Teen Mom star Farrah Abraham is at war with a hairstylist over a collab gone wrong. 
Abraham, 34, and her daughter Sophia, 17, allegedly agreed to have their hair done by Fort Worth-based hair stylist Marseya 'Slay' Ochoa of HBFS free of charge last week, in exchange for promotion on social media. 
However, things took a dramatic turn after the appointment, with Ochoa and Abraham both clashing over the terms of the collaboration before taking the drama to social media. 
Ochoa shared photos and videos of Abraham's matted hair to Instagram on Monday, writing, 'If Farrah Abraham asks you to do her hair - DON'T DO IT. 
I PROMISE IT'S NOT WORTH IT.' 
Abraham responded by calling Ochoa a 'trash hairdresser' and accused her of throwing a 'tantrum' online over the situation. 
Abraham also insisted that she had made it clear that she wouldn't be able to post about the collab until Monday – four days after the appointment took place. 
Ochoa spoke to Daily Mail after the incident and confirmed that she spent 12 hours detangling and coloring Abraham's matted extensions. 
Video footage that Ochoa shared of Abraham's pre-styled hair went viral on social media, with one fan calling the reality star's mane, 'the crustiest hair I've ever seen.' 
'Ew! 
Sorry you had to touch her rat's nest for free,' wrote another. 
'Why the f**k was her hair like that before?' 
another shocked person commented. 
A fourth joked that Abraham's hair 'was dragged through hell and back before you did anything'. 
Despite all the drama, Ochoa was able to fix Abraham's hair in time for Sophia's prom. 
The former MTV star even shared an Instagram post on Monday thanking hairstylist Cecilia Winter and celebrity makeup artist Kelsey Dorsett for getting her and Sophia glammed up, but noticeably did not tag Ochoa in the post. 
Daily Mail has contacted Abraham for comment. 
Abraham shot to fame on MTV's 16 & Pregnant back in 2008 before joining the show's popular spin-off Teen Mom the following year. 
She remained on the series for seven seasons until she was fired for pursuing a career in the adult industry. 
In 2013, she appeared in the commercial sex tape, Farrah Superstar: Backdoor Teen Mom. 
After the success of the sex tape, Abraham continued her work in the adult industry by making strip club appearances and selling molds of her genitals as sex toys. 
She later became a top creator on OnlyFans, boasting that the X-rated platform has made her a multimillionaire. 
Outside of the Teen Mom franchise, Abraham has appeared on Couples Therapy, Botched, Celebrity Big Brother, Marriage Boot Camp, and Ex on the Beach. 
She has also released several books, including the New York Times bestseller My Teenage Dream Ended. 
The mom-of-one has even dabbled in acting and music. 
Most recently, Abraham made a move into politics by vowing to run for Mayor of Austin. 
In 2022, she was arrested and charged with battery following a scuffle with a female security guard outside of a trendy Hollywood bar. 
She then entered a diversion program to have the charges dismissed on the basis of good behavior. 
It wasn't her first run-in with the law. 
In 2018, Abraham was arrested for allegedly hitting an employee of the Beverly Hills Hotel's Polo Lounge, which resulted in her being banned for life as punishment. 
She was subsequently sentenced to two years probation and five days of community service, and 12 hours of anger management classes. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 3.6%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%J. Peterson: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias10.9%This article: 14.1%J. Peterson: 2.8%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic14.1%This article: 9.5%J. Peterson: 1.7%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic9.5%This article: 6.2%J. Peterson: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%J. Peterson: 8.3%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect10.7%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%J. Peterson: 1.7%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias2.8%This article: 2.5%J. Peterson: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias2.5%This article: 43.4%J. Peterson: 17.5%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias43.4%This article: 7.9%J. Peterson: 1.9%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias7.9%This article: 7.0%J. Peterson: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error7.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%J. Peterson: 1.4%Daily Mail: 4.6%Halo Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%J. Peterson: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias5.4%This article: 3.4%J. Peterson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%J. Peterson: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem5.2%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%J. Peterson: 4.5%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.3%J. Peterson: 3.9%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization1.3%This article: 4.7%J. Peterson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring4.7%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 1.2%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.9%J. Peterson: 5.6%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion3.9%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.4%J. Peterson: 3.1%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.4%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.2%J. Peterson: 4.7%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal13.2%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.2%J. Peterson: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.2%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.5%J. Peterson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.5%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 32.7%J. Peterson: 3.7%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote32.7%This article: 7.7%J. Peterson: 2.7%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection7.7%This article: 20.9%J. Peterson: 10.2%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice20.9%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 1.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%J. Peterson: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

597 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers18%attributed speech488writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMarseya 'Slay' Ochoa • 27 words • 100.0% coverageMarseya 'Slay' Ochoa • 6 words • 100.0% coverageFarrah Abraham • 19 words • 100.0% coverageFarrah Abraham • 29 words • 100.0% coverageMarseya 'Slay' Ochoa • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageDaily Mail • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Farrah Abraham

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words44% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+31.9 ptsWriter: 28.5%Farrah Abraham: 60.4%60.4%Biased Writer Voice+20.5 ptsWriter: 19.1%Farrah Abraham: 39.6%39.6%Quote-first Misdirection-3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%Farrah Abraham: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.