Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farrah Abraham results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.9% saturation with 1,119 hits. Analysis detected 3,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,313 of 16,562 topics). This Farrah Abraham is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Farrah Abraham
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 46.9%46.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 46.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos