Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farrah Abraham results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 1,373 hits . Analysis detected 4,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,508 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,223 of 37,536 keywords). This Farrah Abraham is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Farrah Abraham
Keyword details
Total words: 5,508
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst