Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Fox results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 2,381 hits . Analysis detected 13,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,944 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,468 of 6,363 authors). This Laura Fox is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Laura Fox
Author details
Total words: 15,944
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.9% 14.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst