Author summary
61% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,680 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Peacock results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,077 hits . Analysis detected 8,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,173 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,642 of 6,628 authors). This Caroline Peacock is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Caroline Peacock
Author details
Total words: 10,173
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst