Anne Hathaway, 43, addresses facelift speculation after baffling fans with her new look 

By Caroline Peacock61%

5/22/2026, 12:44:21 AM

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

Anne Hathaway has finally addressed facelift speculation after baffling fans with her new look. 
The actress, 43, posted an Instagram video showcasing a trick her hairstylist, Orlando Pita, uses to give her face a lift in March. 
In the clip, she demonstrated how Orlando would create two hidden braids near her temples as means of giving the eye area a little extra lift when creating her hairstyle. 
Soon after she posted the video, speculation that Anne had undergone a facelift began to circulate online. 
Now, in a new interview with ELLE Magazine, Anne opened up on how she found the rumours 'distracting'. 
Posing for the July/August cover issue, she said: 'I wouldn't say pointed. 
But we're at a time when people feel very confident in assuming what they think is fact, and sometimes what they think is accurate and sometimes it's not. 
'My preference would be to never comment on anything and to just live in the mystery and not draw attention to myself, but the speculation has gotten so loud that you do feel the need to just get your truth out there. 
'And I'll probably always wonder, 'Should I have posted that or not? 
Should I have just kept going and done the thing that makes me happy and makes me feel more confident on the red carpet?' 
'But I felt like the conversation was becoming distracting.' 
The Princess Diaries star also stated that having a facelift is a 'huge medical decision'. 
However, she didn't rule out the idea of going under the knife in future. 
She said: 'By the way, these are huge medical decisions that people are presuming. 
I wanted to show that like, 'No, I didn't make a huge medical decision. 
It's just two braids.' 
'And by the way, the other thing about all this is, I might still get a facelift someday.' 
Elsewhere, Anne has reprised her role as journalist Andy Sachs in the long-awaited sequel The Devil Wears Prada 2. 
She reflected on how her life has changed since she first played the part in the original movie 20 years ago. 
She said: 'You know how you'll have certain memories or times in your life that you wish you could revisit because you're like, 'God, I wish I could go back there and be the person that I am now and know what I know now.' 
'That's what it was like. 
'I've always felt this enormous debt of gratitude to the movie and how I was protected, especially by [director] David Frankel. 
'So it was exciting to get to go back and say thank you, and show all the work that I've done on myself and just aim to be an absolute delight every day.' 
Anne added: 'To have worked so hard in my life to have…sorry, I do get emotional thinking about it, to have become a more positive person, to have become a healthier person, to have become a safer person, I was really happy that I could share that with people who were so formative and responsible for so many of the beautiful things that I have in my life.' 
The July/August issue of ELLE UK is on sale from 18 June. 
Read the full interview with Anne Hathaway at https://www.elle.com/uk/the-odyssey/ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.6%Caroline Peacock: 1.9%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 2.1%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 8.1%Caroline Peacock: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Caroline Peacock: 3.2%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect7.6%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Caroline Peacock: 2.3%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 3.2%Caroline Peacock: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 1.6%Caroline Peacock: 6.0%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias1.6%This article: 16.1%Caroline Peacock: 2.7%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias16.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Caroline Peacock: 10.6%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 2.8%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.5%Caroline Peacock: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma2.5%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.5%Caroline Peacock: 6.2%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization2.5%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 3.1%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.1%Caroline Peacock: 4.0%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 8.0%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Caroline Peacock: 2.0%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.2%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading3.2%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 2.7%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.2%Caroline Peacock: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 2.5%Caroline Peacock: 9.2%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice2.5%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 1.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Peacock: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Caroline Peacock: 2.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.8%

554 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker63%attributed speech205writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 28 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 42 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 45 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 33 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Hathaway • 68 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Anne Hathaway

81%flagged-word coverage
349 attributed words100% of attributed speech48% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.2 ptsWriter: 10.2%Anne Hathaway: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-8.8 ptsWriter: 8.8%Anne Hathaway: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.8 ptsWriter: 6.8%Anne Hathaway: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.