Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Devil Wears Prada 2 results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,459 hits . Analysis detected 8,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,572 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,534 of 37,536 keywords). This The Devil Wears Prada 2 is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. The Devil Wears Prada 2
Keyword details
Total words: 9,572
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst