Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jess Cartner-Morley results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 465 hits . Analysis detected 3,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,843 of 6,628 authors). This Jess Cartner-Morley is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Jess Cartner-Morley
Author details
Total words: 4,224
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst