Shawn Mendes' girlfriend Bruna Marquezine shocks fans with alarmingly thin frame ⁠37%

By J. Peterson⁠0%

5/27/2026, 9:24:43 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 840 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (13,939 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the article peer group.

Brazilian actress and model Bruna Marquezine has alarmed fans with her slender frame. 
The 30-year-old, who is currently dating pop star Shawn Mendes, raised eyebrows after attending the Golden Globes back in January. 
Not only did she look much slimmer than usual on the red carpet, the Blue Beetle star also shared a now-viral behind-the-scenes photo of herself on Instagram with her sternum, ribs and collarbones clearly showing. 
She showed off her trim figure again in March while attending the Academy Awards in Hollywood. 
Concerned fans and trolls alike have swarmed Marquezine's Instagram page with comments about her weight in recent months, with many pointing out that she used to be curvier. 
'Bruna is beautiful in every way. 
But the culture of extreme thinness is "screwing up" the heads of women around the world, unfortunately,' commented one. 
'It's her body and she feels good about it... but don't normalize it because it's not normal to be like that,' wrote another. 
A third argued, 'I think for her line of work she "has" to stay in a slimmer shape.' 
Another wrote, 'People, I thought the photo on Twitter was fake and it's not!' 
Others have defended the star, insisting that she's still healthy and beautiful at any size. 
Marquezine has discussed her weight loss in the past, revealing on Instagram in 2018 that she battled body image issues in her early 20s. 
'I hated my body, thought I needed to lose weight, and took a laxative every day for three months,' she wrote at the time, according to The Sun. 
Since recovering, the actress had denied suffering from an eating disorder and has repeatedly insisted that she's happy with how she looks. 
'I am very healthy and happy with who I am and with my body. 
That's all that matters,' she said in 2020. 
Marquezine has also repeatedly fired back at online trolls over their continued speculation around her weight. 
'Women’s bodies are not only there to please men, or please anyone for that matter, we just want to be healthy and happy,' she wrote. 
'If you have opinions that are likely to offend or make someone feel bad about their body, no matter your intention, just stay quiet and do not comment.' 
Marquezine is one of Brazil's biggest stars, boasting over 43million followers on Instagram alone. 
She's been in the spotlight since childhood and was able to transition from a child star into a legitimate actress, primarily starring in popular soap operas. 
The Brazilian beauty is now making inroads in the American market, largely thanks to her role in the 2023 DC Comics blockbuster Blue Beetle and her romance with pop star Shawn Mendes. 
The genetically blessed couple have been dating since late last year and were recently spotted canoodling on a beach in Rio de Janeiro together. 
Before being romantically linked to the Señorita singer, Marquezine was in an on-off relationship with Brazilian soccer star Neymar. 
It comes after Mendes addressed ongoing speculation about his sexuality during an October 2024 concert. 
Telling his fans he was trying to be 'really brave,' the crooner — who famously dated Camila Cabello in the past — revealed he was still 'figuring it out'. 
'There's this thing about my sexuality, and people have been talking about it so long,' he stated, adding it was 'kind of silly, because I think sexuality is such a beautifully complex thing, and it's so hard to just put into boxes'. 
He continued, 'The real truth about my life and my sexuality is that, man, I'm just figuring it out like everyone,' he announced. 
He continued, 'It always felt like such an intrusion on something very personal to me. 
Something that I was figuring out in myself, something that I had yet to discover and still have yet to discover it.' 
He continued, 'And it feels really scary because we live in a society that has a lot to say about that. 
'And I'm trying to be really brave and just allow myself to be a human and feel things. 
And that's all I really want to say about that for now.' 
He continued, 'I was really young when I started. 
I was 15 years old. 
The truth is that I didn't get to do a lot of 15-year-old things and discover parts of myself that you do at 15.' 
He made the remarks before performing his song The Mountain, which includes the lyrics: 'You can say I'm too young / You can say I'm too old / You can say I like girls or boys / whatever fits your mold.' 
He also spoke about the songwriting process, telling the audience, 'Writing the song felt really important to me because it felt like a moment where I could address it in a way that felt close to my heart. 
'And I guess I'm just speaking freely now, because I just want to be able to be closer to everyone and just kind of be in my truth.' 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.1%J. Peterson: 3.6%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%J. Peterson: 2.8%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic6.4%This article: 9.8%J. Peterson: 1.7%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic9.8%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%J. Peterson: 8.3%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect13.1%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.7%J. Peterson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%J. Peterson: 1.7%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 9.8%J. Peterson: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias9.8%This article: 15.6%J. Peterson: 17.5%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias15.6%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%J. Peterson: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error5.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%J. Peterson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias1.8%This article: 2.3%J. Peterson: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.3%This article: 7.7%J. Peterson: 1.4%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.1%J. Peterson: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias11.1%This article: 3.1%J. Peterson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.6%J. Peterson: 4.5%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority12.6%This article: 3.3%J. Peterson: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.9%J. Peterson: 3.9%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization11.9%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.3%J. Peterson: 1.2%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon3.3%This article: 31.1%J. Peterson: 5.6%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion31.1%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.6%J. Peterson: 3.1%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.6%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.7%J. Peterson: 4.7%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal10.7%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.1%J. Peterson: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.1%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%J. Peterson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground1.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.1%J. Peterson: 3.7%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote12.1%This article: 2.4%J. Peterson: 2.7%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 8.1%J. Peterson: 10.2%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice8.1%This article: 3.3%J. Peterson: 1.8%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination3.3%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J. Peterson: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

840 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers43%attributed speech480writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageBruna Marquezine • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBruna Marquezine • 14 words • 100.0% coverageBruna Marquezine • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBruna Marquezine • 25 words • 0.0% coverageBruna Marquezine • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 42 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 23 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 15 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 22 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 21 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 18 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 12 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 9 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 5 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 38 words • 0.0% coverageShawn Mendes • 28 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bruna Marquezine

100%flagged-word coverage
103 attributed words29% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Indoctrination+27.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bruna Marquezine: 27.2%27.2%Unattributed Quote+11.8 ptsWriter: 15.4%Bruna Marquezine: 27.2%27.2%Biased Writer Voice-14.2 ptsWriter: 14.2%Bruna Marquezine: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+12.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Bruna Marquezine: 13.6%13.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.