Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Golden Globes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 2,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,233 of 16,562 topics). This Golden Globes is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Golden Globes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos