Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hungary results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,982 hits. Analysis detected 15,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,344 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,274 of 15,988 topics). This Hungary is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Hungary

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos