Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Levitt results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 636 hits . Analysis detected 6,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,326 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,471 of 6,359 authors). This Michael Levitt is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Michael Levitt
Author details
Total words: 5,326
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.2% 8.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst