Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Robbins results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 748 hits . Analysis detected 6,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,730 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,540 of 6,316 authors). This Sarah Robbins is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Sarah Robbins
Author details
Total words: 5,730
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.8% 11.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst