Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Schmitz results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,277 hits . Analysis detected 10,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,626 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,215 of 6,359 authors). This Rob Schmitz is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Rob Schmitz
Author details
Total words: 7,626
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.7% 9.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst