Author summary
48%3 analyzed articles/videos479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Raney results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 643 hits. Analysis detected 5,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,648 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,562 of 6,359 authors). This Adam Raney is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Adam Raney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
44%Adam Raney (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,648
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate