Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These KNAU Arizona Public Radio results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 216 hits . Analysis detected 1,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This KNAU Arizona Public Radio is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. KNAU Arizona Public Radio Publication details
Total words: 3,732
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst