Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Daniel Ofman results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 216 hits . Analysis detected 1,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,582 authors). This Daniel Ofman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Daniel Ofman
Author details
Total words: 3,732
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst