Topic summary
46% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Crises results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 2,722 hits . Analysis detected 14,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,063 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,626 of 16,562 topics). This Humanitarian Crises is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Humanitarian Crises
Topic details
Total words: 17,063
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.9% 15.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst