Topic summary
59% 7 analyzed articles/videos 10,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historical Revisionism results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 6,525 hits . Analysis detected 49,430 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,510 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,583 of 16,562 topics). This Historical Revisionism is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Historical Revisionism
Topic details
Total words: 43,510
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles43.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst