Topic summary
59% 15 analyzed articles/videos 5,530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Insurance results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,250 hits . Analysis detected 29,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,161 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,474 of 15,769 topics). This Health Insurance is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Health Insurance
Topic details
Total words: 31,161
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score15 analyzed articles31.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst