Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KFF results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 263 hits . Analysis detected 3,565 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,784 of 6,498 authors). This KFF is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. KFF
Author details
Total words: 4,952
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst