Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Julie Rovner results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Anecdotal, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 426 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,392 authors). This Julie Rovner is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Julie Rovner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Julie Rovner (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 426
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles426 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.3%18.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos