Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Najifa Farhat results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 402 hits . Analysis detected 2,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,127 of 6,360 authors). This Najifa Farhat is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Najifa Farhat
Author details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Author 10.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst