Topic summary
48% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gubernatorial Elections results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 3,632 hits . Analysis detected 21,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,689 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,841 of 16,245 topics). This Gubernatorial Elections is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Gubernatorial Elections
Topic details
Total words: 20,689
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst