Topic summary
⁠47%6 analyzed articles/videos1,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Warming results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,279 hits. Analysis detected 13,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,078 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (8,939 of 15,447 topics). This Global Warming is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Global Warming

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos