Author summary
73%2 analyzed articles/videos579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Thompson results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 3,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,599 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,674 of 6,363 authors). This Andrea Thompson is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Andrea Thompson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
74%Andrea Thompson (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,599
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos