Prepare for El Niño, UN warns - it could be the strongest in decades 46%

By Mark Poynting0% Erwan Rivault0% Becky Dale0% Jess Carr0%

6/2/2026, 9:57:27 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 654 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.9% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,997 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the article peer group.

A new phase of the natural El Niño weather pattern could begin in a matter of weeks, the UN has warned, boosting temperatures on a planet already under strain from climate change. 
The World Meteorological Organization said this El Niño is likely to strengthen over the rest of 2026, driving more extreme weather around much of the globe. 
Several forecasts from national weather agencies suggest it could end up as one of the strongest ever recorded - a possible so-called “super” El Niño. 
Predicting the exact timing and strength of El Niño can be challenging, and scientists have been watching conditions in a tell-tale region of the central Pacific for clues. 
El Niño forms when a switch in wind patterns allows warmer waters to spread across the tropical Pacific Ocean. 
And while an El Niño event had been anticipated, many scientists believe this one could be unusually powerful. 
“We're very confident that there's a big event coming,” said Prof Adam Scaife, head of monthly to decadal prediction at the UK Met Office. 
“It may even be a record event.” 
Part of the reason why scientists expect a strong El Niño lies deep below the ocean surface. 
Data from satellites, buoys and ocean floats indicate a huge wave of unusually warm water - more than 6C above average in places - creeping eastwards across the Pacific, hundreds of metres deep. 
The warmth of these waters “rival[s] some of the strongest El Niño events we have seen”, said Michelle L’Heureux, a physical scientist at the US science agency NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center. 
That deep-sea heat is often a precursor to warmer waters at the surface - which then heat the air above, helping to disrupt weather patterns worldwide. 
“El Niño conditions will pour fuel on the fire of a warming world," said UN secretary general António Guterres. 
"Impacts will hit even harder, travel even farther, and cross borders with devastating speed.” 
No two El Niño events are the same, and different places can be affected at different times of the year. 
But a strong El Niño typically fuels hot, dry weather in parts of South America, South East Asia and Australia, raising the chances of droughts and wildfires. 
It can also weaken the Indian monsoon and bring drier conditions to northern parts of the Greater Horn of Africa - while heavier rainfall can increase the risks of flooding in the southern US. 
El Niño can even increase the chances of a mild start and cold end to UK winters - although its links with weather in north-west Europe are not as strong. 
Past events have been linked to spikes in food prices and hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars in lost income globally, as crop failures and trade disruptions ripple through supply chains and economies. 
As El Niño typically peaks in strength around Christmas time, it is impossible to know for sure that it will be a record-breaker with months still to go. 
El Niño is very sensitive to wind patterns, for example, which are difficult to predict far in advance - “the biggest wildcard” for El Niño, according to L’Heureux. 
But even if El Niño falls short of “super” territory, the consequences could still be extreme. 
That is because we have never experienced El Niño on a planet already so hot from human-caused climate change. 
The year “2027 is very likely at this point to be the [world’s] warmest year on record,” said Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist with the Berkeley Earth group in the US. 
In 1998, the world had “an incredibly strong El Niño event and an incredibly hot year for the time", he added. 
“If [that] happened today, it would be an incredibly cold year compared to the last two decades.” 
“It just goes to show how big an impact humans are having on the climate.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.8%Mark Poynting: 3.8%BBC News: 3.8%Confirmation Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.1%Mark Poynting: 9.1%BBC News: 9.1%Availability Heuristic17.1%This article: 8.7%Mark Poynting: 2.2%BBC News: 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic8.7%This article: 2.6%Mark Poynting: 0.6%BBC News: 0.6%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 19.7%Mark Poynting: 11.0%BBC News: 11.0%Overconfidence Bias19.7%This article: 6.0%Mark Poynting: 4.6%BBC News: 4.6%Framing Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 1.3%BBC News: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Mark Poynting: 1.3%BBC News: 1.3%Optimism Bias5.4%This article: 5.7%Mark Poynting: 2.0%BBC News: 2.0%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 25.1%Mark Poynting: 14.1%BBC News: 14.1%Negativity Bias25.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Mark Poynting: 1.2%BBC News: 1.2%Halo Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Mark Poynting: 0.8%BBC News: 0.8%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.9%Mark Poynting: 5.9%BBC News: 5.9%Appeal to Authority20.9%This article: 2.4%Mark Poynting: 0.6%BBC News: 0.6%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.0%Mark Poynting: 5.0%BBC News: 5.0%Hasty Generalization8.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.6%Mark Poynting: 5.0%BBC News: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 2.3%Mark Poynting: 1.1%BBC News: 1.1%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 12.2%Mark Poynting: 3.1%BBC News: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.2%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.3%Mark Poynting: 1.1%BBC News: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.3%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Mark Poynting: 1.0%BBC News: 1.0%Unattributed Quote4.0%This article: 5.8%Mark Poynting: 10.1%BBC News: 10.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.8%This article: 10.1%Mark Poynting: 3.1%BBC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice10.1%This article: 4.4%Mark Poynting: 2.2%BBC News: 2.2%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Poynting: 0.0%BBC News: 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

654 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers43%attributed speech375writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
UN • 14 words • 100.0% coverageUN • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWorld Meteorological Organization • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageProf Adam Scaife • 24 words • 100.0% coverageProf Adam Scaife • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle L’Heureux • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAntónio Guterres • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAntónio Guterres • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle L’Heureux • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageZeke Hausfather • 31 words • 0.0% coverageZeke Hausfather • 21 words • 0.0% coverageZeke Hausfather • 17 words • 0.0% coverageZeke Hausfather • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

UN

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words16% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Biased Writer Voice+64.5 ptsWriter: 5.1%UN: 69.6%69.6%Indoctrination+30.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%UN: 30.4%30.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.