Speaker summary
66%7 analyzed articles/videos137.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UN results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50.5% saturation with 87.789 hits. Analysis detected 528.633 faulty-reasoning hits from 137.667 analyzed words across 7 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of 34% (18,973 of 28,364 speakers). This UN is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.1% percentile
20.6% BS Score7 analyzed videos137.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.5%50.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.4%21.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate