Topic summary
⁠76%4 analyzed articles/videos1,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Roles results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 2,245 hits. Analysis detected 13,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,110 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (8,951 of 15,759 topics). This Gender Roles is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Gender Roles
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,110
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos